Which? Complains To SRA About Davenport Lyons
09 December 2008 - Sarah Sharpe - © Hellmail Postal News
Consumer magazine Which? has today complained to the solicitors’ watchdog about a London law firm that sent ‘bullying’ letters to hundreds of innocent consumers.
Davenport Lyons has been hunting for internet users who it believes have illegally shared copies of video games and gay pornography. The alleged file-sharers received letters from the law firm demanding payment of £500 compensation for copyright infringement.
However, letters sent out rely on IP addresses and with so many unsecured wireless networks and file sharing sites which spoof IP addresses, serious questions are being asked about the validity of evidence put forward by Davenport Lyons, evidence already discredited by at least two other European countries.
The case was featured on BBC's Watchdog programme this week, and both Watchdog and 'The Real Hustle' have highlighted the relative ease with which many home networks can be breached. Many of those wrongly accused by Davenport Lyons say that their claims of innocence are ignored completely and simply followed with continued demands for money.
Michael Coyle, solicitor advocate with Lawdit who is currently representing hundreds of UK citizens who have received threatening letters, says that using IP addresses alone to pinpoint file sharers is 'a nonsense' and that Davenport Lyons are using heavy-handed tactics.
Which? has written to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority complaining about what it describes as 'bullying and excessive', pointing out that during a recession, more and more companies will be looking to make money from individuals and that the SRA should take decisive action. Which? has invited anyone wrongly accused by Davenport Lyons to contact whichcomputingnews@which.co.uk.
A number 10 petition has also been created at: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/InfComISPDatProt/
Steve Lawson, editor for Hellmail the postal industry news site said: "Its a disgrace that an apparently respected firm of solicitors is relying on such poor evidence and sending out letters to frighten the wits out of people that in many cases have done nothing wrong at all, and then for those people to discover that they are not even being listened to."
Click here for a print-friendly version of this article
Information on advertising opportunities can be found here
See Also >>
Hellmail content is covered by copyright and may not be reproduced without a return link to the article.







